Grade 3

Informational

Writing Extended Response

Compose Full Texts

Astronauts (Informational)

Conventions

Evidence/Elaboration

Organization/Purpose

There are run-on sentences (the first sentence in paragraph three should be four separate sentences, and the last paragraph is also a run-on).

There are many above-grade-level errors, which do not impact the score, but there are also unnecessary commas (“THE job of a astrnot is like, floating in a tin can…” and “THIS is beause, I like wringing…”), missing apostrophes for contractions (“thats”), and a missing endmark in the final sentence.

There are unnecessary capital letters (“THE” and “THIS”) and missing capitals (“earth”).

There are errors with articles “a/an,” but no other grade-relevant errors.

Spelling errors include “astrnot”; “wehr”; “Sometims” ;“apinyon/ a pinyon”; “favrot”; “diffront”; ”timse”; “wringing” (writing); “siontist/siintistt” (scientists); “whit” (what). Some words may not represent grade-level errors (&#8220;meteors and astrology&#8221;).

This response addresses the topic, but most details are either unexplained (“astrnots try to stop meders and as-troys”) or irrelevant (“thats my apinyon .you may have a diffront a pinyon” and “I like wringing”).

There is minimal evidence that source details are used (&#8220;no gravity&#8221;, &#8220;robots&#8221;), and there are no efforts to attribute any information.

Some elaboration is effective ([being an astronaut] 
&#8220;is like, floating in a tin can out in a place wehr there is no gravity&#8221;), but most other attempts at elaboration are irrelevant and ineffective (&#8220;thats my apinyon .you may have a diffront a pinyon&#8221;).

The language is very vague (“scared sometimes”; “being a astrnot is hard work”; “favrot thing to do”) and often causes confusion.

The response is brief and confusing, showing no evidence of style beyond the first simile about an astronaut’s job being similar to “floating in a tin can.”

The focus is confusing: the main idea lacks clarity (“the job of an astronaut”), and there are drifts (“I like wringing” and “my apinyon”).

Attempted transitions are minimal and ineffective.

There is a vague attempted introduction about what it means to be an astronaut (“floating in a tin can”), but there is no conclusion.

This response has little or no discernible organizational plan.

Content Explorer

Sample Items Website

Tools for Teachers

Smarter Reporting

Remote Teaching and Learning

More Resources for Teachers

Privacy

Diversity, Inclusion & Equity

Web Accessibility Statement

Policy

Instagram

YouTube

Pinterest

Twitter

Facebook

Connect

An annotation is the educator’s explanation of how a portion of the student’s response relates to the rubric and contributes to that trait’s score. For example, the educator might explain how the response meets the expectations of a specific score point. An annotation can also describe aspects of a student response that relate to multiple score points on the rubric to demonstrate nuance when determining a score.

Annotation

One of three traits scored for the ELA performance task full write, this trait measures a student’s ability to demonstrate command of grade-level conventions of standard English: grammar usage (including sentence formation), capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.

This trait measures students’ ability to select and integrate details that support, explain, illustrate, or develop ideas. Students should elaborate these details—that is, explain and connect them, guided by the writing purpose and audience needs.
For informative/explanatory and opinion/argumentative writing purposes, these details come from source materials.
For narrative writing, this trait is called Development/Elaboration, and students are expected to integrate and develop grade-appropriate story elements such as descriptive details and dialogue. For these tasks, events and experiences are inspired by source materials.

This trait measures students’ ability to establish and sustain a focus for the writing. This focus should be consistent with the task’s designated purpose and the intended audience. Strong introductions and conclusions (or, for narrative writing, beginnings and endings) and transitions help to create coherence.

Performance tasks measure a student’s ability to demonstrate critical-thinking and problem-solving skills by challenging students to apply their knowledge and skills to complex, real-world problems. In the performance task, students are presented with a collection of questions and activities connected to a single theme or scenario. These activities ask students to demonstrate capacities such as depth of understanding, writing and research skills, and complex analysis, which cannot be adequately assessed with traditional assessment questions. Performance tasks are taken on a computer (but are not computer adaptive) and take students one to two class periods to complete.

Performance Task

The prompt is the text provided to the student that requests their response. It includes some contextual information, but also includes a specific task that students complete in their writing response.

Prompt

For a deeper dive into the content behind this student response, navigate to the Sample Items Website to access the writing prompt or visit the Content Explorer to learn more about this content area.

Prompt & Target

“Purpose” is the context for a piece of writing, or what the writer intends to accomplish. Students write texts with the following purposes:
<ul>
<li>Narrative (grades 3–8): tell a story</li>
<li>Informational (grades 3–5): present facts or data using source material</li>
<li>Explanatory (grades 6–11): explain a topic or concept by analyzing source materials</li>
<li>Opinion (grades 3–5): present and defend a position</li>
<li>Argumentative (grades 6–11): present an argument using research to form and support claims</li>
</ul>
Purposes have subtle differences depending on grade, and each writing purpose has its own scoring rubric.

Purpose

This text was written by a student in response to a Performance Task writing prompt.

Response

A rubric is a set framework for scorers to reference when determining the quality of student writing. Each trait has its own rubric, and every point value is defined in detail with examples of what to expect from student writing at each level.

Rubric

Donec sed odio dui. Aenean eu leo quam. Pellentesque ornare sem lacinia quam venenatis vestibulum. Nulla vitae elit libero, a pharetra augue. Nullam id dolor id nibh ultricies vehicula ut id elit. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.

Sample Term One

Sample Term Two

Traits are different dimensions of a student response that educators evaluate when scoring. For example, an educator will assess grammar and spelling as part of the Conventions trait (maximum of two score points) but not take grammar or spelling into account when assessing the other traits. This approach ensures that scorers evaluate student writing from multiple angles.

Example for Grade 3: Informational – Astronauts (Informational) - ID: 5551

More Resources for Teachers

Connect

Policy